On 11/9/06, Jorey Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> which I don't think can be used in older versions anyway. The only other area
I
> have been concerned about is how we have been progressively adding to the
chain
> of strcmps in request object where special stuff has to be done when accessing
> or setting attributes. This would only be an issue though if user code did
lots
> of request object attribute lookups which fall into the set where the serial
> strcmps are done. Cleaning up request object was one of the things on my
mental
> list for next version.
Hmm, it's interesting that you mention this, as that is what the
function I'm benchmarking does most of the time: It returns information
about the request object and its attributes, with a few sys & os objects
thrown in for reference. I wanted to test against something text-rich
and dynamic, but somewhat self-contained so I wouldn't be distracted by
external processes and their bottlenecks.
But going back to 3.2.10 hasn't restored the performance I was seeing
earlier, so this may be a nonissue. I'll report back if there are any
changes.
+1 FreeBSD 6.1p10, Apache 2.2.3 (prefork-mpm), Python 2.4.3
--
Jeff Hinrichs
Dundee Media & Technology, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]