Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > > According to Jeff: > > > A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but > > I don't see anything that looks like a veto. > > I voted -1 at that time which is a veto. > > My opinion hasn't changed and I still think that it is a very > stupid idea to add a "feature" that allows our users to do > something which is stupid and absurd. > > *shrug* but as everyone seems to think that this is a good idea, > feel free to ignore my veto. >
A Veto is a Veto. If you feel strongly enough about it, then it cannot be, and should not be, ignored. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
