Nick Kew wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:44:33 -0500 (EST) > Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > > > On 12/15/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I see your point 100% though... I really hoped that we would > > > > have had a 2.2.4 out sooner, but the votes didn't come as > > > > fast as expected :) > > > > > > What votes? I haven't seen any votes for 2.2.4. -- justin > > > > > > > For the proposed backports in STATUS. > > Your original prompting towards a 2.2.4 release stimulated a lot of > activity in and around STATUS - and not just low-hanging fruit. > That's as it should be. > > If folks can find time to deal with outstanding matters, great. > If not, go ahead and draw a line.
That was it... as RM, I wasn't quite yet ready to draw that line. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
