Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > As 3rd parties might want to use the provider interface to provide their own > storage > providers it might be worth discussing if we *should* make this a public API > and should > install it via "make install".
Someone probably has ;-) That said, +1 for this in trunk/httpd 2.4 for certain. Because it looks like a moving target, and we are late to the game, I wouldn't really hassle with it for httpd 2.2.
