On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:35:24 +0100 Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mån 2007-02-12 klockan 21:55 +0000 skrev Nick Kew: > > > Because the chunking filter is equipped to discard the chunk that > > takes it over the limit, and substitute end-of-chunking. > > If we do that in a new filter, we have to reinvent that wheel. > > Not sure substitue "end-of-chunking" is a reasonable thing here. It's > an abort condition, not an EOF condition. Imho you'd better abort the > flow, that way telling the client that the request failed instead of > silently truncating the response. How would you abort it other than by truncating it? Don't forget, the headers are long gone. If you don't send an end-marker, the client will sit there waiting for more. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
