While working on porting latest mod_jk on i5/OS V5R4, I see on this platform a different behaviour than on stock Apache 2.0.x implementations.
The sent_bodyct (request_rec) is still zero whereas it's set on others implementations. This flag seems to be set in ap_http_header_filter(), so I'd like to get more information about it, ie when it's called to check if mod_jk is right or if the problem is on i5/OS. Regards
2007/4/27, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Well did the double configuration happen in the same thread or did there is a fork between the first and second config ? 2007/4/25, Greg Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > --- Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi to all, > > > > I'm trying to adapt mod_jk to i5/OS v5r4 and see the following in > > mod_jk.log (debug mode) > > > > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:44 2007] [6589:0038] [debug] jk_uri_worker_map.c > > (423): rule map size is 0 > > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:44 2007] [6589:0038] [error] mod_jk.c (2701): > > Initializing shm:/www/dapserver/logs/jk.shm.6589 errno=3025. Load > > balancing workers will not function properly. > [...] > > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:44 2007] [6589:0038] [info] mod_jk.c (2743): > > mod_jk/1.2.22 initialized > > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:45 2007] [6589:0038] [debug] jk_uri_worker_map.c > > (423): rule map size is 0 > > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:45 2007] [6589:0038] [error] mod_jk.c (2701): > > Initializing shm:/www/dapserver/logs/jk.shm.6589 errno=3025. Load > > balancing workers will not function properly. > [...] > > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:45 2007] [6589:0038] [debug] mod_jk.c (2661): > > Initialized mod_jk/1.2.22 > > > > It's strange but it seems the initialisation is done twice. > > > Is it a specific i5/OS (IBM HTTP Server power by Apache) case or general ? > > not so strange. Apache httpd has been running thru the config twice at > initialization for a long time. most modules know how to deal with it. yes it > would be more straight forward if we could just run it once, but that would > require revamping the config system. > > Greg > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
