Niklas Edmundsson wrote: >> >> This is a separate issue; we need to refactor out 90% of the subrequests >> and treat these at top level requests. > > OK. I was under the impression that those subrequests were made to > filter out stuff you don't have access to from the directory listings, > but I stand corrected.
Oh - they still need to fail - and we still need to (for example) validate both the RNFR and RNTO target paths. But for trivial requests such as RETR the double-test is silly. >> I discovered while trying to accomodate named virtual hosts (the hack to >> let [EMAIL PROTECTED] resolve to the host.com vhost) it's simply not worth >> hacking one without the other. > > Ah. Am I right in guessing that making it play well with mod_cache would > come more or less for free after the request-refactoring is done? :)
