tis 2007-05-22 klockan 11:40 +0200 skrev Niklas Edmundsson: > ---------8<----------- > Does anybody see a problem with changing mod_cache to not update the > stored headers when the request has max-age=0, the body turns out not > to be stale and the on-disk header hasn't expired? > ---------8<-----------
My understanding: It's fine in an RFC point of view for the cache to completely ignore a 304 and not update the stored entity at all. But the response to this request should be the merge of the two responses assuming the conditional was added by the cache. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
