Bojan Smojver wrote:

>>    I apologize for joining this thread a little late.  I know it's
>> more complicated, but I'm inclined to suggest trying to bring the more
>> comprehensive trunk fixes into 2.2.x.
> 
> Just a ping on the status of this backport...

   The proposals are in the 2.2.x STATUS file, but no votes yet
(except mine).  I know the patches are a little daunting -- normally
I wouldn't propose such large changes as backports -- but in this
case I felt it was the best option, since the key "pools" and "groups"
changes are simpler to understand and implement if you've got the
other bits of tidying in place first.

Chris.

-- 
GPG Key ID: 366A375B
GPG Key Fingerprint: 485E 5041 17E1 E2BB C263  E4DE C8E3 FA36 366A 375B

Reply via email to