I'm assuming the "we" is you, right?
It is not just me. We are a team and of course the users. Just as an example
the other post from me here which is a report from an other webmaster. I
report here test results from the Apache Windows Community from the Apache
Lounge, mostly I receive them by mail.
To give an idea, there are almost 80.000 thousand downloads 2.2.4 from the
two primary sites of the Apache Lounge. I have no figures from the mirrors
and others who are making it available, I think an extra few thousand.
I respect that you want to release. But it is a pity that we have leave them
in the dark with 2.2.6 . But on the other hand, for me, 2.2.6 has minor
changes over 2.2.5. Maybe we have to patch 2.2.6 to get it error-free.
Yes we all aware that 2.2.5 is not released and when they download they are
informed that it is/was a test-release. Don't worry too much, not a lot
windows users are posting on the lists. I shall put a an extra note that
they cannot expect response on the lists.
Btw.
The authors of the modules are investigating the issues right now. I do not
expect that they are coming soon with solutions.
Steffen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 17:52
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate
tarballs for review
On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Steffen wrote:
k
I the meantime we have to advise the users not to use 2.2.6 because is
not compatible with some mods (not just mod_fcgid). We shall advise to
stay on 2.2.4 or 2.2.5 RC.
What other mods is it not compatible with? So far, I haven't
heard anyone else confirm your reports. Also, as you
know, there was no 2.2.5 released, so make sure that if they
do bother to use that, not to post anything on the user or
dev lists saying "I'm using 2.2.5 and..." because it is
likely they will be ignored :)
I'm assuming the "we" is you, right?
