On 10/8/07, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/8/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thoughts on adding mod_substitute to 2.2.x under experimental? > > if in 2.2.x at all, why not in the normal modules directory? is it > really experimental, or is experimental considered a political > compromise, or is there something else I'm not thinking of? >
Personally I'd like to see it under experimental. Then users know it may still contain errors or bugs. Once it's been tested by a larger number of end user and all works as it should it can be move right? -- ~Jorge
