On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Could we start by increasing the existing one, which is rather easily done,
and then move on to doing it the fancy way? If someone has a fancy-patch
right now I'm all for that, but pending that I'd prefer landing some sort
of improvement...
I don't quite see the reasoning of having 2-steps to a solution, an
intermediate that doesn't land in 2.2 or 2.4)...
Just the logic of having some improvement committed if noone gets
round to doing it the fancy way. If it gets replaced by a fancy
solution it's not that much extra work that has been put into it, but
if it's forgotten we'll have to live with yet another major version
with this annoyingly small default buffer.
/Nikke
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Can I have someone to eat?" - Spike
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
