On 11/3/07, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the purpose of creating a sub pool here? I don't see directly that > l->pool has a shorter live time than st->pool. Any pointers? >
You are correct in that It is not required at the moment. It's a compromise between zapping the pool reference in that per-ldap-connection data structure completely and leaving it to accomodate a future change in the lifetime of entries in the ldap connection pool. In the interim, since the entire structure is essentially 'checked out' of the connection pool, l->pool can at safely be used during request processing. -- Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
