On Feb 13, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Erik Abele wrote:
On 13.02.2008, at 16:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I added something similar to mod_jk quite awhile ago, and
I'm trying to get mod_jk and mod_proxy closer to parity,
esp for those using AJP. So with that in mind, comments
on the below??
Index: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml
===================================================================
--- docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml (revision 627440)
+++ docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml (working copy)
@@ -693,6 +693,16 @@
in the pool the Apache will return <code>SERVER_BUSY</code>
status to
the client.
</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>disablereuse</td>
+ <td>Off</td>
+ <td>This parameter should be used when you want to force
mod_proxy
+ to immediately close a connection to the backend after being
used, and
+ thus, disable its persistant connection and pool for that
backend.
"persistent" instead of "persistant"?
+1 to the rest.
me no spelll too guud :)
