On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 07:27:15AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Basant Kukreja wrote: >>> just that, too. Any performance comparisons with its competitors? >> Some quick performance comparison results between mod_sed, mod_line_edit >> and >> mod_substitute. >> >> Search/Replace string : s/hello/hi/ >> test0.html : No matches, so no substitute. >> test.html : 1 comparision/substitute >> test2.html : 500 comparision/substitute >> >> Performance data was generated with 200 clients for 100000 requests (for >> worker >> mpm). >> $ ab -c 200 -n 100000 <http-uri> >> >> Requests Per Second (RPS) as measured by ab for s/hello/hi/ substitution. >> mod_sed mod_line_edit >> mod_substitute >> test0.html 3263 3206 3129 >> test.html 3229 3213 3197 >> test2.html 1278 404 1130 >> >> Note that mod_sed performs better than either mod_line_edit or >> mod_substitute. > > Interesting... What versions of each did you test? OS : solaris 64 bit x86 nevada snv_79 Apache : httpd 2.2.6 64 bit worker mpm. mod_substitute.c : From httpd-2.2.8. mod_line_edit --> Version 1.0 Network connection : Dedicated 1 GB e1000g card. Server : X4100
Regards, Basant.
