On Aug 4, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/04/2008 03:50 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Mon Aug 4
05:53:50 2008
@@ -1380,7 +1380,6 @@
proxy_worker *worker = (proxy_worker *)theworker;
if (worker->cp->res) {
worker->cp->pool = NULL;
- apr_reslist_destroy(worker->cp->res);
}
return APR_SUCCESS;
}
Well, you've beat me :)
The complete conn_pool_cleanup function can be omitted, and
there is no need for checking if (conn->worker->cp->pool)
in the connection_destructor.
Might be. At the current state it makes it possible to keep
trunk and 2.2.x very similar until all in apr land is sorted
out. We can cleanup the remaining parts then.
+1. Let's wait until APR gets sorted out before we start
mucking around with "fixing" 2.2 and trunk to handle an
in-flux APR
