On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:09:56 -0400 Tom Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Kew wrote: > > On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:30:49 -0000 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> remove proposal accidentally added twice > > > > I was about to ask whether you planned to vote on the other > > instance of it, when I saw: > > Looking at the "backport to 2.2" votes in STATUS, they all seem to be > from experienced httpd maintainers; so I was unsure if I should vote > myself or wait for three +1's from others before proceeding. Your +1 in STATUS is worth the same as anyone else's. That's a threshold you passed when you became a committer. Another thing you can do now when you have time for it is to review proposals in STATUS and vote and/or comment on them. > > That's actually different: only the first patch was already > > proposed. Maybe you'd like to clarify? > > r670061 was my first attempt to fix it. > > Ruediger pointed out that this change could break forward proxies in > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.devel/34670 > so I corrected the fix in r670198. Then it would be a good idea to include that in the backport proposal, typically by amending the existing one (add a note something like "please add r670198"). -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
