Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd
like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to
release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll
close the vote on Tues AM.
-1
Doesn't build on Windows.
apr-util included doesn't include the
backport of r667437, so it break compiles with
nasty warnings
Oops. Wrong archive file (used 2.2.9 instead 2.2.10)
Builds fine, so +1
Windows 32
Windows 64
Sorry for the noise :)
Regards
--
^(TM)
