On 11/28/2008 06:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group schrieb: >> >> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: Paul Querna >>> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55 >>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org >>> Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R >>> >>> Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: >>>> What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for >>> T&R on the weekend? >>>> As far as I remember autoconf 2.61 had some problems. >>> I'm not actually sure now days what specific version should >>> be used, I >>> haven't done RM in a while :-/ >>> >>> Just make sure you use a local copy, hand compiled version, not >> That was my plan. Jim what versions did you use last time? > > The generated files in the httpd distribution and also in the bundled > apr/apr-util tell us it was autoconf 2.61 and libtool 1.5.26. > > There was a short discussion about autoconf versions and apr and httpd > releasing before 2.2.10: > > http://marc.info/?t=122168206000001&r=1&w=2 > > The technical reasons for nit chosing 2.62 are contained in the > discussion starting with your mail > > http://marc.info/?l=apr-dev&m=121814441110258&w=2
Thanks for the pointers. Any objections going with autoconf 2.63 and libtool 1.5.26? If autoconf 2.63 is seen as too risky I would go back to autoconf 2.61. Regards Rüdiger
