Issac Goldstand wrote: >> > That sounds right and more in line with the normal httpd release > procedure - that would mean doing (4) before (1) and leaving the rest > as-is.
Pretty much, yup. The confusion reigns when we aren't sure if a user is complaining about 1.34-dev, 1.34-RC1, 1.34-RC2 or 1.34-Gold. So this gives us a very simple binary question (did you grab from SVN or take a release al la CPAN) to decide if the user is running what we expected. And as folks have hinted, version no's are cheap :)
