Paul Querna wrote: > > However, I expect if there was a critical security vulnerability, we > would at least provide patches, and/or do a release -- lots of peoples > jobs are still tied to 2.0.x :-)
Right - the question is more between bug fixes (possibly disruptive to the user and certainly disruptive to the developers of 2.2 and 2.4/3.0) and security releases (quite possible for a long while to come).
