On 01/18/2009 05:23 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> On Jan 8, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Paul Querna wrote: >> >>> Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes. >>> >>> I guess 2.3.1 was DOA. >>> >>> I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on >>> starting 2.3.2 early next week? >>> >> +1 > > Is there any concern about the SNI support sitting in trunk? IIUC > Joe's specific concern (testable failure) referenced in the stalled > backport proposal are addressed by a later trunk commit, but there is > still the spectre of similar but undiscovered cases and the issue of > non-SNI clients.
I guess this needs to be sorted out during our alpha releases phase and definitely be solved before releasing 2.4 GA. I currently don't worry about it for alpha releases. Maybe a good topic for the Hackathon at AC EU if Joe is there :-). Regards Rüdiger
