On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Brian McCallister <bri...@skife.org> wrote:
> I can see how this fits with the spec, but I'd still prefer to find a > different way to pass that information. One way, though I do not like > it much more, is to pass the bytecode in as the filename and look for > lua bytecode's initial bytes: 1b 4c 75 61 51 00 ( <escape> Lua <null> > ) -- this is kind of stinky overloading, but not *totally* insane. <escape> LuaQ <null> sorry :-)
