Mladen Turk wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> >> If someone is shipping apr trunk, that's a big >> mistake (theirs, not ours, we'll still ship the true apr 2.0 at some >> point which will be grossly incompatible to such one-offs). >> >> Part of this is the desire by Paul to move the project to scons. I'm >> prepared to merge the autoconf, but it's a bit more than an evening >> project to combine apr and apr-util. His hope was that scons is ready. >> > > Just one question ... > What did you meant with "combine apr and apr-util" ? > Does it mean apr-util will cease to exist and become part of apr, > or you just commented the scons work
It's about apr and apr-util becoming a single library (in 2.x). > (Just when I mastered autoconf, here comes the python. > What about something easier like lisp ;) Oh really, scons should make things so much easier for everyone. Python vs. m4 is a hands-down win any day. :) If you want easier like lisp -- well now, i've heard of languages that have even less structure and keywords to learn http://tinyurl.com/ying or are more polite http://tinyurl.com/zuh32 ... -- Brane > > Regards
