On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Dan Poirier <poir...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Torsten Foertsch <torsten.foert...@gmx.net> writes: > > > On Wed 15 Apr 2009, Dan Poirier wrote: > >> I'm wondering - what's the state of Apache::Test and httpd/test? Are > >> there active developers using them who understand how they work? Or > >> have they fallen into disuse? > >> > >> Background: I wanted to see if I could write some tests for the new > >> SNI features, so I started looking at Apache::Test. Unfortunately > >> it's been some years since I had my head deep into the Perl way of > >> doing things, and even after looking over the documentation, I think > >> it would take me a long time to get to the point where I could write > >> new tests there. > > > > The modperl users list modp...@perl.apache.org is for you. I think > > you'll find answers very shortly. > > Thanks, if I decide to use Apache::Test I'll go there. > > I'm still wondering if Apache developers in general (outside the modperl > folks) are still actively using Apache::Test? > Issues with the failure of one testcase or another (mod_negotiation, mod_include, ssl FakeBasicAuth) have been discussed recently on this list. Sometimes information about pass rate is discussed when testing a proposed release tarball. (And FWIW, it found an OS bug the last time I set it up with a new Solaris development build.) There's not much activity, but AFAIK its the only game in town for sharing httpd testcases.
