Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On May 5, 2009, at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> I'd like to work on a mod_ftp release to go along >>> with the 2.2.12 release... I think baselining mod_ftp >>> for only 2.2.x makes sense, and I'd really like to get a >>> release out. >>> >>> What's the status? I've done some prelim tests and they >>> look good. >> >> See STATUS? > > For an *alpha*?
Actually, a beta, but of course! You ask for status, we point you to status :) Why would we revert to alpha anyways? http://httpd.apache.org/download.html Nothing substantial changed since the last release vote passed, only; *) Corrected logged count of bytes STORed or APPEnded when >4GB. [Jim Jagielski, William Rowe] so if anyone is itching to fix this bug, I'm ok with another beta. I see you just resolved the FTPLimit schema. The .h's just need to be corrected in order to bless this as release [it doesn't stop us at httpd core, but I'd like to set a slightly higher bar for public/private APIs ;-] We probably aught to resolve the low-numbered port binding which I believe I know how to do without offending sensibilities [after reviewing the voluminous complaints against mod_watchdog's initial design and behavior within the parent process.] If we overcame that unexpected restriction (it would be sad to ship a ftp /release/ without addressing ports 22/21 ;-] then I see no reason for this not to undergo a 1.0.0 release vote.
