On 05/05/2009 07:15 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jfclere > Date: Tue May 5 17:15:48 2009 > New Revision: 771940 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=771940&view=rev > Log: > Change the order of mod_proxy and mod_proxy_balancer child_init(). > Change the balancer workers area to the address of workers instead copying > the workers. > Arrange lbmethod accordingly. > Move the creation of conf->forward worker to mod_proxy child_init(). > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/balancers/mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/balancers/mod_lbmethod_byrequests.c > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/balancers/mod_lbmethod_bytraffic.c > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/balancers/mod_lbmethod_heartbeat.c > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/examples/mod_lbmethod_rr.c > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c >
> @@ -1471,13 +1471,13 @@ > > PROXY_DECLARE(void) > ap_proxy_add_worker_to_balancer(apr_pool_t *pool, proxy_balancer *balancer, > - proxy_worker *worker) > + proxy_worker **worker) IMHO providing *worker as the old code does is sufficient. > { > - proxy_worker *runtime; > + proxy_worker **runtime; > > runtime = apr_array_push(balancer->workers); > - memcpy(runtime, worker, sizeof(proxy_worker)); > - runtime->id = proxy_lb_workers; > + memcpy(runtime, worker, sizeof(proxy_worker *)); Do we really need memcpy here? Shouldn't *runtime = *worker be sufficient or in the case that we go back to the old function prototype shouldn't *runtime = worker be enough? Regards Rüdiger