On Fri, 22 May 2009 07:38:16 -0700 (PDT) bugzi...@apache.org wrote: [ouch, just replied to bugs@ - sorry]
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30586 > --- Comment #1 from Dan Poirier <poir...@pobox.com> 2009-05-22 > 07:38:14 PST --- It looks like this is still a potential issue in > trunk. Looks like you're probably right. But it's not clear to me why there's a fixed-size buffer there in the first place, rather than just using the string already allocated in apr_pstrndup, truncated at the colon if applicable (chunk 1), and (I haven't checked the other half, but it looks similar). If noone shouts, I might just hack that. Bug me if I drop it. -- Nick Kew
