"Brian J. France" <br...@brianfrance.com> writes: > On Sep 21, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > >> Brian J. France wrote: >> >>> I believe this is the first patch that will break binary >>> compatibility >>> because it adds a function pointer to the middle of the struct. I >>> believe binary compatibility could be retained if we add the function >>> pointers to the end of the struct instead of in the middle. Moving >>> the >>> function could be part of the back porting patch to 2.2, but leave >>> it as >>> is in 2.3+. >> >> Would it be possible to move the function pointers to the end of the >> struct for httpd-trunk as well? Breaking binary compatibility is to be >> avoided if it can be, even on trunk. > > > Sure. Which method would be preferred? Having two hooks or just one > and use the request_rec to get the filename?
As long as the filename can be gotten trivially from the request rec, I'd say keep things simple and just add the one hook. -- Dan Poirier <poir...@pobox.com>
