On 10/01/2009 03:45 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Paul,
Paul Querna schrieb:
very likely, mod_serf in its current for should just be polished to
replace mod_proxy_*, and all of the async stuff should be pushed
towards the MPMs......
well the question is:
do we want to export ap_process_request_after_handler() in the future,
and if so we should AP_DECLARE it;
Well as Paul commented it is just a quick hack to get mod_serf running
+0
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
I've just found that test/mod_dial_up.c uses this function too in line
119 ...
Gün.