Hi Graham, Graham Leggett schrieb: > I would feel a lot better if this process was documented somewhere, so I > didn't have to sit and guess what stupid thing I had missed, and not > knowing what I'd missed, not be in a position to fix it. dont worry - many of us have fallen into such traps ... /me too years ago when I posted my first mod_jk binary release - nobody told me about 664, and only when we did next release and someone else of the project wanted to remove the old bins they told that I missed this piece; though the bins sync'd fine, so that was certainly not the issue; also recently when I released the first NetWare binary here I found that Brad had the binaries 644 (and they were sync'd fine), and I was going to ask him to change perms, but then I thought 'lets try a rm -f', and suprisingly I could remove them! So I dont think its really needed to document this, at least it wasnt in the past until this .14 release that the permission would have any effect - and as I posted to Bill in other post I *had* the NetWare bins 664 from first minute when I moved them to dist, and they showed not up until few hours ago - certainly someone else from infra pushed the right button and fixed sync ... and btw. as I posted on mebers my cron job at p.a.o also stopped working some weeks ago, and magically started working again two days ago (after I posted); maybe mine was not the only cron job which stopped :)
> Or alternatively, a quick message to say "we're up to our eyeballs in > ddos, please hold we'll back get to you". that's also something which I dont find polite - if we have an issue, and post to infra then I think we should go quickly a reply back - I cant believe that they are too busy to just press the reply button and write few words like: message received - we will work on it asap, and report back when it works. I believe the time for such a one-sentence-reply must be available, and even an auto-responder would be better than just nothing, giving one the feeling of getting ignored. Gün.
