On Sunday 04 October 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Personally, I'd like to see this as part of the actual > code core, where we have several Timeouts, eg: > > Timeout 30 5 10 2 > > which define timeout as now, timeout before 1st byte, timeout > between bytes timeout after etc... > > We've always wanted better control over this ind timeouts and > putting it in a module seems not a good idea for 2.4/3.0 > (but of course, OK for 2.2.x) >
I think putting mod_reqtimeout into trunk until it is backported to 2.2 and then moving it into the core would make sense, wouldn't it? And I would prefer several config directives instead of having to remember which value in Timeout means what.
