Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. > <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >> Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> As far as repairing, I switched to the syntax used elsewhere in the >>> makefile. But I'll try the other syntax very shortly. >> IIRC that syntax was selected to avert the makefile from aborting in case of >> failure. > > Is this a valid test? (sorry, in the middle of getting the 10 YO off to > school)
We don't want the non-valid result code to kill the build in this case. The && syntax takes care of avoiding further complications, and it should just plug on.
