On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Chris Darroch <chr...@pearsoncmg.com> wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> FCGIDOutputBufferSize -> FCGIDResponseBufferSize >> >> FCGIDBusyTimeout -> FCGIDRequestTimeout >> FCGIDBusyScanInterval -> FCGIDRequestTimeoutScanInterval (unfortunate >> name for unfortunate concept) > > Hmm ... can't say I have any opinion on those, really. I suppose > "Response" is somewhat more specific than "Output". > > If we're thinking about axing or replacing the "busy scan" at > some point, maybe we should just leave those two named as-is?
works for me
