On Oct 7, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Does this really require a CHANGES entry??
No. There is at least one other CHANGES entry about a changed comment,
though.
CHANGES isn't, and shouldn't be, an external replacement for svn log.
Instead, it should be a place where external user-facing changes are
documented. If it changes the user-land experience, it belongs in
CHANGES.
Yes, however, we have not been 100% consistent in this, however :)
