You mean it would not accept any connections, or just some? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Niklas Edmundsson <ni...@acc.umu.se> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Michael Felt wrote: > > Would you care to comment on a preference for CC definition when using XL >> compilers. I am leaning towards xlc. >> > > I've had a long standing problem with CC=xlc optimizing away some crucial > part of the accept-loop in httpd, so it wouldn't process connections. The > workaround has been to use CC=cc. Haven't tried CC=xlc or xlc_r with the > recent patchsets of xlc/vac 9/10 though, so this might just be me emitting > stale noise. You'll notice if you hit this issue ;) > > And yes, everything Jeff stated is of course correct. > > /Nikke > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | ni...@acc.umu.se > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > RETIREMENT: When you stop living at work and start working at life. > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >