You mean it would not accept any connections, or just some?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Niklas Edmundsson <ni...@acc.umu.se> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Michael Felt wrote:
>
> Would you care to comment on a preference for CC definition when using XL
>> compilers. I am leaning towards xlc.
>>
>
> I've had a long standing problem with CC=xlc optimizing away some crucial
> part of the accept-loop in httpd, so it wouldn't process connections. The
> workaround has been to use CC=cc. Haven't tried CC=xlc or xlc_r with the
> recent patchsets of xlc/vac 9/10 though, so this might just be me emitting
> stale noise. You'll notice if you hit this issue ;)
>
> And yes, everything Jeff stated is of course correct.
>
> /Nikke
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | ni...@acc.umu.se
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RETIREMENT: When you stop living at work and start working at life.
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
