On 11/03/2009 07:19 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Author: sctemme
> Date: Tue Nov  3 18:19:33 2009
> New Revision: 832496
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=832496&view=rev
> Log:
> We now check for OCSP support in configure, so we can lose an OpenSSL version
> number check.  Use a type safe STACK.
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h
>     httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_util_stapling.c
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h?rev=832496&r1=832495&r2=832496&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h Tue Nov  3 18:19:33 
> 2009
> @@ -39,8 +39,7 @@
>  #include <openssl/rand.h>
>  #include <openssl/x509v3.h>
>  
> -#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x00907000
> -#define HAVE_OCSP
> +#ifdef HAVE_OCSP
>  #include <openssl/x509_vfy.h>
>  #include <openssl/ocsp.h>
>  #endif

I guess this brings back some problems on Windows and Netware:

See threads starting at

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200910.mbox/%[email protected]%3e

and

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200911.mbox/%[email protected]%3e

But I guess Guenther can explain this better.

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to