I'm with Jim, Head for 2.4 first.
IIRC there was some talk about moving to a 'd' project, since httpd now does ftp (mod_ftp), echo, pop3,... and some other protocols. I don't remember much from it though. I did like the idea back then but thats about the only thing I remember from that. Maybe we could also poll the user base? I know there was a restart on the debate about the current conf and lua/perl/whatever not so long ago so maybe these are all things to look into again for a 3.0? Just my .2 cents /me off to studying windows 2008 server -_- ~Jorge On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > Let's get 2.4 out. And then let's rip it to shreds and drop > buckets/brigades and fold in serf. > > On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Akins, Brian wrote: > >> So, after several conversations at Apachecon and on the list, we still >> have >> no real "vision" of how we want to move ahead with httpd "3.0." Or, if we >> do, it's not communicated very well. >> >> Some have suggested we just create a new server project. Others want to >> keep >> hacking away at the current code base. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -- >> Brian Akins >> > >
