On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 15:00, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <bua...@buanzo.com.ar> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Greg Stein wrote: >> Right. But they don't have the depth/breadth of modules like we do. > > ... yet. Keep going, but if there are great things like lighttpd and nginx > (and even more) http > daemons out there, then that means more than one thing is wrong with current > Apache.
Oh, definitely. HTTP serving is commodity functionality now. Thus, it is very easy to serve niches with a specialized HTTP server. Apache remains the broad solution, but for narrow requirements, people will select something that is easier to handle for their particular situation. I wouldn't say "wrong", but more along the lines of "not as well-suited" Cheers, -g
