On 10.01.2010 10:04, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 09.01.2010 23:34, [email protected] wrote:
>> Author: niq
>> Date: Sat Jan  9 22:34:51 2010
>> New Revision: 897570
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897570&view=rev
>> Log:
>> We shouldn't need to create r->allowed_methods twice!
> 
> Maybe we should not create it twice, but shouldn't we
> 
> new->allowed_methods = r->allowed_methods;
> 
> instead?

Ok, forget about it. Your pointer in the backport proposal gave me
the correct hint.

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to