On 1/21/2010 1:52 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 21.01.2010 08:20, wr...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: wrowe >> Date: Thu Jan 21 07:19:41 2010 >> New Revision: 901578 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=901578&view=rev >> Log: >> Correctly align the behavior of headers_in to be consistent with the >> treatment of headers_out, resolving PR 48359 by keeping subrequest >> scope changes out of the main request headers. This ensures that all >> requests-without-bodies behave as the requests-with-bodies code has.
> > I think this is wrong. Think of the case where the subrequest does not change > anything on headers_in. In this case the contents of headers_in of the request > and the subrequest are the same (the subrequest has a copy of the requests > table). Doing an apr_table_overlay would result in a table that has all key > value pairs of the original headers_in doubled. Makes sense; reverted that bit.
