On 1/26/2010 4:42 PM, n...@apache.org wrote: > @@ -171,6 +168,8 @@ > Ported to 2.2; > http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/protocol_headers_copy.patch > +1: wrowe > + -1: niq: this risks breaking existing apps, as discussed in > + comments on PR 48359.
Just to be 100% clear, you are vetoing a change which promotes one of the two preexisting, alternate behaviors [varied based on the presence or absence of a request body], preferring the one which applied to all requests with request bodies [this case does not change], and eliminating the one which applied to requests without bodies [which further caused a segfault when headers_in is modified.] We have no agreement with developers not to fix undocumented misbehavior.
