On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Guenter Knauf <fua...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > Jeff Trawick schrieb: >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Guenter Knauf <fua...@apache.org> wrote: >>> BTW. while I was on that found that in httpd's roll.sh the gpg signing >>> part looks wrong to me - therefore I kept the way how the signing user >>> is handled same as was before in apr's release.h; but I believe it >>> should be fixed for httpd's roll.sh: >> >> I can't comment on the exact patch, but I had issues with this section >> of httpd's roll.sh signing the mod_fcgid release currently in test and >> had to comment out the setting of args. > I have tested this signing section a bit more with gpg (the part which > differs and looks wrong) and think it can be simplified like this: > http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testsigning/testsigning.sh.txt > > please everyone who has some mins test this test script with/without > username argument, f.e.: > ./testsigning.sh httpd-2.2.14 > and: > ./testsigning.sh httpd-2.2.14 yourname > > and then report back if it works or not, and which tool and version you > used (gpg or pgp - I bindly assumed in the script that pgp also knows of > --version)
works for me with gpg 2.0.14
