On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dan Poirier <poir...@pobox.com> wrote: > Nice. Maybe change "count" to "messages_skipped" but that's just a > quibble.
There are probably a lot of quibbles with my 20 second API design :) I wonder first if it is acceptable to the group to do without an init call, and live with the consequences. (no opaque structure/lack of future-proof, more parameters on the logging call) > I wonder where else this would be handy? dunno at the moment; at least it would be utilized by the MPMs for this message and the one about getting within MinSpareThreads
