I have a question how to proceed. Is there really no interest in doing
this? (And fixing mod-vhost-alias as well.)

Or should I fill the bug and attach the patch? Or ...?

Thanks,
Ondrej

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:30, Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> wrote:
>>> We could do something interesting with moving this to the req rec in 2.4
>>> (on 2.3 trunk) but it wouldn't solve your issue today with 2.2 or 2.0,
>>> which will not change.
>>
>> I am fine with that it doesn't get into 2.2 or 2.0. But I think that
>> fixing this in the right place would allow all other vhost modules to
>> benefit from that. mod-vhost-alias could be fixed as well.
>
> Here's the first version of patch for 2.3-trunk which implements
> per-request document_root.
>
> I have also updated m-v-a to use this new functionality.
>
> It compiles cleanly, however I'm not sure it it's complete. I hope I
> found all places where new request_rec is initialized, but I may have
> missed something.
>
> Ondrej
> --
> Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>
> http://blog.rfc1925.org/
>



-- 
Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>

Reply via email to