On 10/28/2010 9:04 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > Just for the record, I once offered it for inclusion. The verdict of > dev@ was that the dependency on a library the size of libxml2 > was a showstopper, which seemed (and seems) fair enough.
And in hindsight, looking at the state of libexpat, I'm sort of wondering if this wasn't an 'oh, whoops!'
