On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 19:23:07 +0200 Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote:
> The lack of this one feature is the most cited reason I've been given > for why people have moved away from mod_include as a template > processor to other template processors within other servers. Rather > than moving to an entirely new type of server, I'd rather we just fix > the core problem. Wouldn't the same argument support an onerror="url" clause too? Yes, you can use an errordocument. But there seem to be a lot of users who find that a difficult concept to grasp (an error document that we intentionally use???), so it's not really a great answer. Besides, an errordocument could easily end up getting overloaded! The implementation should presumably be straightforward alongside what you propose, and could use an errordocument processing path. -- Nick Kew
