Am 02.12.2010 10:39, schrieb Joe Orton:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:37:49PM -0000, fua...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1040177&view=rev
Log:
Supress compiler warning.
...
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c Mon Nov 29 16:37:49 2010
@@ -204,7 +204,12 @@ AP_DECLARE(int) ap_set_keepalive(request
* THEN we can be persistent, which requires more headers be output.
*
* Note that the condition evaluation order is extremely important.
+ *
+ * Silent compiler warnings for (r->chunked = 1) with #pragma
*/
+#ifdef __WATCOMC__
+#pragma disable_message(105)
+#endif
Eww. Do you really need to litter the source code with this stuff? Can
you not flip compiler switches in the Makefiles? Regards, Joe
no. If I use a compiler switch it aplies for all source files which is
certainly not what I want - instead I only want to suppress this one
warning about assignment inside condition where the comment states that
its ugly but wanted, while at all other places the very same warning is
important and useful since you can just acciedently miss a 2nd '=' where
you dont want to assign but only compare.
I even expect to add more pragmas for other compilers, f.e. gcc, at this
place if we would compile with all possible warnings (maybe -Wall is
already enough).
Gün.
