On 08/12/2010 18:07, Eric Covener wrote:
... and assume overlaps are intentional opt-in to name-based vhosts?
The selection algorithm would not change, meaning you'd still only be
selecting from the best ip-based match.
We'd lose the warning about overlapping vhosts, and maybe incur some
overhead on mapping a vhost that was unintentionally showing up
multiple times.
Just kicking the idea around since NVH seems to be tough for users to grok.
+1 !
And this somehow raises a cousin one into my mind. While we are fixing
vhosts, how about :
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50436