> -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Jagielski > Sent: Freitag, 7. Januar 2011 16:57 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: Huge memory leak in mod_substitute > > > On Jan 7, 2011, at 10:46 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > > On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:59:26 +0100 > > "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote: > > > >>> The obvious question would be whether the "q" flag affects your > >>> observations. But the detailed bug report suggests > that's unlikely. > >> > >> Isn't it the case that "q" is the default for one substitution rule > >> and for more than one it is no longer? > >> That would explain the different behaviour. > > > > Bah. I'd misread Test 2 in the report - saw just the one rule. > > > > I guess it just boils down to the logic of when folding does or > > doesn't get optimised out. > > > > I think it's just the nature of the beast... at least, > the nature of the design where if we need to be able to > scan between buckets, we need to flatten and that takes > time and space... lots o' space. > >
Agreed. Regards Rüdiger
